The Citizens of Maui are standing up for the world.
Now we ask for the World to stand up for Us.

Donate button

Read and Download the new Ordinance for the people.

Ordinance for the People

The Maui County Temporary Moratorium on GMOs

Donate button

Joe Marshalla explains the Shaka Movement and the Temporary Moratorium

Donate button

GMO Moratorium Initiative Launch Event Pt. 1

GMO Moratorium Initiative Launch Event Pt. 2

Donate button

The SHAKA Movement is an advocacy, communications and educational outreach program and hub, where people and organizations come together to work in unison to affect a positive change for the environment and for the people of the Hawaiian Islands. We are committed to bringing forth informed scientific facts through peaceful communications and actions so as to protect, preserve and improve the Public Trust Resources for current and future generations. We are a self-organizing grassroots movement, which means that each of us who participates, is the movement. To read more please click HERE.


Donate button

These videos will get you started… and there’s lots more in the Video Section

Hemo Wai Bros. ” ‘Aina Warriors”

A Conversation with Walter Ritte – A MUST SEE

Moloka’i MOM – Standing Up to GMO

How Monsanto Silences Scientific Dissent

Donate button

 To view article on-line click here

Biotech Dangers from Open Air Experimentation of “GMO” Life Forms and Pesticide Combinations Force Maui County Citizens to Demand Hawaii State Constitutional Protection

The alarming increase of birth defects and rare illnesses testified to by local doctors during recent public hearings in Kauai County and the lack of federal and state oversight is forcing Maui County citizens to stand up to Hawaii’s GMO giants on their own. While biotech industry lobbyists scramble to block them, five Maui citizens, with community support through the SHAKA Movement, are using a unique clause in the state constitution to call for a temporary moratorium until the agro-chemical companies show current scientific data and proof that their GMO practices are not harmful to people and the land.

Five Maui County citizens are going toe-to-toe with Hawaii’s mammoth agricultural biotech industry with the submission of a new ordinance, written by the people, for the people and voted on by the people, as a ballot initiative in the 2014 November general elections.

This first-of-its-kind on Maui citizens’ initiative calls for a temporary moratorium of all genetic engineering (GE) operations within Maui County until the Biotech companies finance a detailed Environmental and Public Health Impacts Study (EPHIS), administered by the county, showing current scientific data and proof that open air experimentation of GE crops and associated mixed pesticide use is not harmful to people and the land.

Over 500 people attended a petition drive kick-off event on Monday, Feb 24th. More than 200 people registered to collect signatures and left with petitions in hand, excited to meet the deadline for collecting 8500 registered Maui County voters’ signatures by March 31st.

The five citizens, Mark Sheehan Ph.D., (environmentalist and health advocate) Lorrin Pang M.D., MPH (consultant to the World Health Organization since 1985, selected as one of America’s Best Doctors – top 3%) Lei’ohu Ryder (Spiritual Kumu), Alika Atay (indigenous Hawaiian natural farmer and Hawaiian Spiritual Leader), and Dr. Bonnie Marsh N.D., (Naturopathic Doctor) all spoke of their concerns for the land, the health and well being of all of Maui County’s residents, and particularly its children. The evening concluded with a presentation from world-renowned GMO, Roundup and biological weapons expert, Retired Colonel, Dr. Don Huber.

The event was coordinated by the SHAKA Movement (Sustainable Hawaiian Agriculture for the Keiki (children) and the ‘Aina (land)), an advocacy, communications and information hub in Hawaii. http://www.ShakaMovement.org

The five citizens assert that the multiple crops each year of Genetically Engineered (GE) seed, other GMO experimentation and chemical cocktails (multiple pesticides applied in combination or in sequence) in Maui County differ significantly from the GE food farming occurring elsewhere in the world, and pose unique risks that have not been studied and are not adequately monitored by county, state or federal agencies. (http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/files/cfs-bill-2491-written-testimony–7-15-13_24101.pdf For an ordinance to amend the Kaua’i County code 1987 relating to pesticides and genetically modified organisms. July 2013) (http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0042768 A Preliminary Investigation into the Impact of a Pesticide Combination on Human Neuronal and Glial Cell Lines In Vitro, August 03, 2012)

Mark Sheehan said, “The citizens of Maui County have serious concerns as to whether the GE seed operations, open-field mixing of pesticide cocktails, and GE crop experimentation occurring in Maui County are causing irreparable harm to the people, the environment, and public trust resources.”  (http://www.beyondpesticides.org/infoservices/pesticidesandyou/Winter%2003-04/Synergy.pdf Synergy: The Big Unknowns of Pesticide Exposure 2004)

Hawai’i is the only US state whoseCoronel constitution stipulates that the land, water, air and other the Public Trust Resources have rights unto themselves and must be defended from harm and “…shall be conserved and protected for current and future generations.” Lobbyists for the agro-chemical industry are actively working against GMO regulations and are aggressively pushing state legislators to pre-empt and strip local counties of their right to regulate GMO and biotech industries on the local level.

“Right now there’s a big movement by the industry, the state and the feds to preempt us, trying to say that we cannot be more precautionary,” said Dr. Pang, “that goes against the basic principles of Precaution.“

“The Precautionary Principle says each lower level of government has the right to be more precautionary than the levels above them. You can’t preempt a local government from being more precautionary.” said Dr. Pang, “If the federal regulators are not going to regulate for us, then the state has a right to do it. If the state is not going to regulate for us, then each county has the right to do it.”

“More and more information is coming out about the risks of pesticide exposure, especially to children.” Sheehan continued. “A November 2012 report by the American Academy of Pediatrics, cited ‘growing evidence that developing fetuses and children are particularly vulnerable to pesticides.’” (http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/pages/AAP-Makes-Recommendations-to-Reduce-Children’s-Exposure-to-Pesticides.aspx).

“At least 50 doctors, nurses and health professionals testified to their concerns of pesticide exposure at recent public hearings on Kauai, citing specific and rare birth defects, some that may be occurring at a rate 10 times above the national average.” says Sheehan.  (http://www.stoppoisoningparadise.org/#!doctors-nurses-to-mayor—sign-the-bill/cgpz  Sample Medical Testimony – Kaua’i Doctors Oct, 2013.)

“This throws the safety of all GE operations into question, which brings the ‘Precautionary Principle’ to bear.” says Sheehan, “Our moratorium shifts the burden of proof back to the Agro-Chemical companies. They have to stop their potentially risky practices until they publicly share whatever current research they may have that scientifically proves what they are doing in Maui County is not harmful to current and future generations.”

Areas of Maui’s groundwater are already significantly contaminated with pesticides, including DBCP and TCP, from former conventional pineapple growing operations.  (https://info.ngwa.org/GWOL/pdf/872944335.PDF “DBCP, EDB and TCP Contamination of Ground Water in Hawaii” Nov 1987. )

In 1999 Maui County successfully sued the companies who made and used the chemicals that polluted Maui’s groundwater. They agreed to pay the majority of costs for 30 years to filter pesticides from polluted aquifers. (http://www.co.maui.hi.us/documents/22/DBCPsettlement.PDF  Settlement Agreement and Release of All Claims, Sept 1999)

“Based on our previous experience with pesticide companies poisoning of our aquifers we’re very concerned with what’s happening with GE operations in Maui County. Biotech practices here involve unprecedented use and experimental mixing of pesticides, none of which have been tested together, nor in concert with what’s already in the ground” says Sheehan. (http://ecowatch.com/2014/02/26/petition-launched-to-halt-gmo-production-pesticide-use-in-hawaii/ Petition Launched to Halt GMO Production, Pesticide Use in Hawaii Feb 2014)

“I’m very concerned for the combinations because each new combination could have stunning effects”, Says Dr. Pang, “The minute you combine them, all hell can break loose.” (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11585.html Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees, Apr 2012) The five citizens maintain that the Hawai’i Dept. of Agriculture does not have an adequate regulatory structure in place to monitor GE crops or to aid in understanding the impacts that experimental and seed crops have on Maui’s environment, public health, economy or cultural heritage.

“The land and waters surrounding Maui County have cultural and spiritual significance in Hawaiian traditions.”, says Sheehan, “This heritage would suffer irreparable harm if the natural environment of Maui County was contaminated by GE practices.”

“Another concern,” says Sheehan, “is that there are no known or proven scientific methodologies or procedures to recall GE organisms or decontaminate the environment from any damages once GE organisms are released and contamination has occurred. One example is the uncontrollable invasion of GMO papaya across the island of Hawai’i. With no way to stop it, after just a few years, GMO papaya is well on its way to eradicating all Non-GMO varieties.”

“Hawaii’s remote location,” adds Sheehan, “has long been seen as a bonus from the risk assessment perspective of GMO experimentation. If an environmental catastrophe occurs here there’s some chance of it being sequestered from the rest of the world.”

“If you really step back it may look like we’re just a big experiment, a big research lab to experiment with – effecting people”, asserts Alika Atay, “so it’s questionable, are we being sacrificed?”

 

Maui May Become Hawaii’s Next Battlefield Over GMOs and Pesticides

By Sophie Cocke   12/05/2013

The fight over genetically engineered crops and pesticides is shifting to Maui.

Councilwoman Elle Cochran plans to submit a bill to the Maui County Council on Friday requiring agricultural companies to disclose details about their pesticide use to the county, while farmers would have to report any genetically altered organisms they are growing.

The bill mirrors legislation that recently passed on Kauai over the protests of biotech companies that have vowed to sue the county.

It also comes on the heels of Big Island Mayor Billy Kenoi signing Bill 113 into law on Thursday. It bans biotech companies from growing genetically altered seeds and farmers from harvesting any new GMO crops.

The spate of legislation reflects a growing frustration at the county level toward what some council members say is lax state oversight of pesticides and GMO crops. And it marks a widening offensive by the increasingly organized anti-GMO movement in Hawaii.

Maui County has twice tried and failed in recent years to pass GMO labeling laws and the county already bans GMO taro for Native Hawaiian cultural reasons.

Cochran said that her bill does not specifically target biotech companies. But they will likely be most affected, if the legislation passes in its current form.

The bill requires commercial agricultural companies that use more than 5 pounds or 15 gallons of restricted use pesticides to disclose what chemicals they spray, where and in what quantities. Monsanto, Dow AgroSciences, as well as Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co., will likely be affected.

The bill would apply to all of Maui County — including the island of Molokai where both Monsanto and Dow AgroSciences operate and collectively employ nearly 200 people. Monsanto also operates in Kihei on Maui and HC&S has sugarcane fields in central Maui and on the north shore.

Adolph Helm, project manager at Dow AgroSciences on Molokai, said that it was premature to comment on the specifics of the bill.

While the fight over GMOs and pesticides on the Big Island and Kauai have often been heated, Helm said he hoped that discussions in Maui County will remain civil.

“I just hope that it will be a discussion that is done in a way that is respectful and done in a collaborative effort with the county council and the mayor’s cabinet and in a way that we can always look at both sides of the issue,” said Helm.

The debate on Molokai over biotech could grow particularly contentious. The biotech industry supports about one-tenth of the island’s population, but is also home to Walter Ritte, one of the state’s most visible anti-GMO activists.

In a move that might potentially preempt the county legislation, Monsanto forged an agreement with Maui Mayor Alan Arakawa that promises to disclose details about its pesticide use and increase community outreach.

Cochran says that the memorandum of understanding between the mayor and Monsanto doesn’t go far enough. “Not even close,” she said.

 

ISLAND VOICES

Counties can legally regulate ag practices

For Sunday, December 1, 2013

By Paul H. Achitoff

POSTED: 01:30 am. HST, Dec 01, 2013

 

Recent enactment of Kauai Bill 2491 and the Hawaii County Council’s passage of Bill 113 have set off a clamor for the state Legislature to strip the counties of authority to protect people and the environment from irresponsible agricultural practices.

 

This campaign originates with the chemical/biotech companies and the largest agribusiness interests, alarmed by these efforts to provide some protection the state has refused to give its citizens.

 

The rumor that the state already has sole power to regulate anything agricultural is false, despite contrary legal-sounding asser- tions. HRS S46-1.5(13) gives the counties the power to protect health, life and property “on any subject or matter” not conflicting with state law. And regardless of any state law, counties can restrict “noise, smoke, dust, vibration, or odors” (HRS S 46-17). Each county is different and has the authority to respond to different needs, even if that may inconvenience some multinational corporations.

 

Arguments about which level of government should control, while couched in terms of general policy, somehow always reflect the self-interest of the people making them. The same person denouncing the federal government for ignoring states’ rights will defend federal regulations they like. When a county takes action, those with contrary preferences suddenly insist the state must take control — until the state passes a law they do not care for.

 

Counties across the country have been exercising some control over agricultural practices for many, many years, and efforts to strip them of that power are nothing new. Campaigns for sole state control of pesticides always come from the chemical/biotech companies and those, like the Hawaii Farm Bureau Federation, in thrall to them. When the U.S. Supreme Court held 22 years ago that federal pesticide law does not preclude the counties from restricting spraying, the chemical companies lobbied states to do so.

 

And some did — but Hawaii did not. Had it done so, the people of Kauai who live with pesticides drifting into their schools and yards from the GMO growers’ fields that surround them would still be shouting for help from the state — which would still be ignoring them, as it has, shamefully, for years. People with sick children breathing toxic chemicals can get pretty tired of being told by industry lobbyists and government bureaucrats that they have insufficient respect for science.

 

The argument for state preemption of local control is always the same: We need “uniformity.” But this never seems to mean laws that uniformly protect people and the environment, only laws that uniformly do not. This latest preemption panic has been set off by Kauai Bill 2491, which mandates modest, common-sense pesticide disclosure and buffer zones around schools and rivers, and Hawaii County Bill 113′s effort to avoid having the county overrun by biotech crops, which in other places have contaminated conventional crops and made them unmarketable, causing hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.

 

Had the state done its part to protect Kauai’s people, or show any spine in the face of biotech bullying and relentless expansion, perhaps the grassroots would not have had to turn to county government for relief. The proper response is not to strip the counties of ability to help, or to offer insulting “voluntary agreements” from an industry seeking to prevent laws that would hold them accountable. It is for the state to step up and protect the people and the aina.

 

 

———————————————————————————————————————————————————— 

A report was released today proposing a link between genetically modified foods and gluten-related disorders: everything you need to know – including a brief article summarizing the findings – can be found at www.glutenandgmos.com.
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) Linked to Gluten-Related Disorders

Do you or a loved one suffer from gluten sensitivity? You may be wondering why you react to gluten now even though you never did in the past. You may be wondering why a gluten-free diet has helped, but has not completely resolved your symptoms. If you are on a quest to find all of the pieces to the gluten puzzle, this information is for you. In today’s report, released by the Institute for Responsible Technology, a team of experts proposes a possible link between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and gluten-related disorders. The analysis is based on Dept. of Agriculture data, Environmental Protection Act records, medical journal reviews, and international research. You can find all of the following at www.glutenandgmos.com:

Stay Away from GMOs

Many people who discover they are gluten-sensitive actually increase their intake of GMOs because they switch from wheat products to corn products. With 88% of the U.S. corn crop genetically engineered, avoidance of GMOs in the gluten-free community presents a unique challenge to consumers.

The best way to avoid GMOs is to consult the NonGMOShoppingGuide.com or download the free iPhone app ShopNoGMO. Look for products with either the “Non-GMO Project Verified” or the “Certified Organic” seal. Avoid ingredients derived from the foods most likely to be genetically modified. These include soy, corn, cottonseed, canola, sugar, papaya from Hawaii or China, zucchini, and yellow squash.

If you have seen improvement in a gluten-related condition after eliminating GMOs from your diet, please email healthy@responsibletechnology.org to share your story.

If you have a friend or relative suffering from gluten sensitivity, ask them if they eat GMOs and forward this email to them!

Help us to reclaim a non-GMO food supply!
Safe eating begins with INFORMED eating!

*    Commit yourself to making history and saving the ‘Aina.
*    Join the SHAKA movement at shakamovement.org
*    Register to vote A.S.A.P. if you are not already registered to vote.
*    Sign the petition in person at one of our locations or with a petition carrier by March 31st.
*    Become a Petitioner and help collect signatures.
*    Learn more at the website and tell everyone you know about the campaign.
*    Watch one of the videos on the site that you haven’t seen.
​*    Remember to vote for the moratorium on November 4th!.

We need everyone to tell at least one new person about the SHAKA Movement every day.

We need everyone posting and re-posting images or videos from this site to all your social media sites.

Donate button